Gemini-News

South Carolina Port Incentives: Tax Credits

By | Gemini News | No Comments

The South Carolina Ports Authority is able to offer clients powerful tax credits for increasing volume via South Carolina port facilities and/or making certain port-dependent capital investments. Below is a brief summary of these incentives.

VOLUME INCREASE INCENTIVE:

To qualify for the incentive, the client must have employees in South Carolina and be paying payroll withholding taxes or corporate income tax.

After the establishment of a base year of volume, the client could receive up to $200 per FEU or $100 per TEU based on incremental growth. Provisions are in place for non-container clients.

The company can apply for the payroll tax credit any year it grows its volume by at least five percent (5%) via a South Carolina Port.

The origin/destination of the cargo is not a determining factor.

The tax credit is delivered as cash refund from the SC Department of Revenue to be used however the client sees fit.

If the refund exceeds the company’s payroll tax liability for the tax­able year, the excess amount may be carried forward and claimed against withholding taxes or corporate income taxes over the next five succeeding taxable years.

The client is required to track and report their own volumes.

 

VOLUME INCENTIVE EXAMPLE:

Client A has several Southeast U.S. facilities including a manufac­turing & distribution operation in South Carolina that employs 200 workers. In Year 1 the client moved 10,000 FEU, of which 1,000 FEU moved via the Port of Charleston.

Client A establishes Year 1 as its base Port of Charleston volume.

In Year 2, the client increases its volume via the Port of Charleston from 1,000 to 5,000 FEU. Some of that volume was delivered to the South Carolina facility, but not all of it.

After documenting Year 2 volume via the Port of Charleston, Client A may apply for and receive a payment from the State of South Carolina for up to $800,000 (4,000 FEU increase X $200/FEU = $800,000). If the amount exceeds the client’s annual payroll tax liability the excess may be carried forward to subsequent years.

Client A may apply for the credits again in Year 3 provided its vol­ume increases by more than 5% over Year 2.

CMA CGM, COSCO Container Lines, Evergreen Line and Orient Overseas Container Line to establish “OCEAN Alliance”

By | Gemini News | No Comments

Shanghai, April 20, 2016 – CMA CGM, COSCO Container Lines, Evergreen Line and Orient Overseas Container Line today signed a Memorandum of Understanding to form a new Alliance enabling each of them to offer competitive products and comprehensive service networks covering the Asia-Europe, Asia-Mediterranean, Asia-Red Sea, Asia-Middle East, Trans-Pacific, Asia-North America East Coast, and Trans-Atlantic trades.

This is a milestone agreement among four of the world’s leading container shipping lines. Each line will offer best-in-class services to customers with fast transit times, competitive sailing frequencies, and the most extensive port coverage in the market.

“This new partnership will allow each of its members to bring significantly improved services to its respective customers,” member carriers said in a statement. “Shippers will have an attractive selection of frequent departures and direct calls to meet their supply chain needs, including access to a vast network with the largest number of sailings and port rotations connecting markets in Asia, Europe and the United States.”

“The Alliance will also bring service reliability and the most efficient integration of the latest vessels in a fleet of over 350 containerships. Initially the deployment will cover more than 40 services globally mostly connected with Asia, including about 20 services each in the U.S. and Europe related trades.”

Subject to regulatory approvals of competent authorities, the new Alliance plans to begin operations in April 2017. The initial period of the Alliance shall be five years.

Further details about the new Alliance and the transition plans from the four member lines in their current alliances will be communicated to stakeholders and the market in due course.

 

Protecting Your Shipment Data

By | Gemini News | No Comments

By Sara Mayes, CEO and President

We often receive inquiries from our member companies questioning how details of their shipments are found in the public domain.  Many shippers come to this realization based on unsolicited offers for services highlighting details of past international shipments.

Many shippers are unaware that detailed information of their containerized shipments is available, including importer and/or shipper names and addresses, and description and quantity of cargo, carrier information and ports of load and discharge.

Under US federal law codified in 19 CFR 103.31(a) certain information on inward and outward vessel manifests may be examined, copied and published by accredited representatives of the press, i.e., newspapers, commercial magazines, trade journals and similar publications.  Shipment data from Customs ACE system is also aggregated by numerous trade data organizations who sell the data to the public for a fee.

As surprised as shippers are to find this information in the public domain, they are often equally surprised to learn there is a way to stop this from occurring.   Under 19 CFR 103.31 (d), an importer or consignee may request confidential treatment of its name and address contained in inward manifests, to include identifying marks and numbers. In addition, an importer or consignee may request confidential treatment of the name and address of the shipper or shippers to such importer or consignee.

Importers and exporters may obtain confidential treatment for certain manifest information by filing a simple letter with US Customs, outlining the trade names they wish to exempt from reporting.  The process requires shippers to submit this request every two years.

It a world where data transparency is growing, it may seem futile for shippers to try and protect their data from prying eyes, but with a limited amount of effort, shippers can protect their detailed information from outside parties.   If you want some help preparing a request letter, please contact Gemini Shippers Group at info@geminishippers.com, and we will walk you through the steps to complete the process.

 

 

 

Leading Trade Groups Announce Fifth Annual “Imports Work” Week on May 9-13, 2016

By | Gemini News | No Comments

Washington, DC – April 13, 2016 – A leading group of business associations and other organizations announced today that the fifth annual “Imports Work Week” will take place on May 9-13, 2016. Imports Work Week is an effort to draw attention to the essential role that imports play in the U.S. and global economy.

This year’s Imports Work Week takes places in the midst of Congressional debate on a series of trade measures, including the recently concluded Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and ongoing negotiations for trade agreements covering transatlantic commerce, services, and environmental goods. During the week, numerous associations and think tanks are expected to take part by publishing commentaries and blog postings, along with other grassroots and social media activities.

As Roberto Azevêdo, Director-General of the World Trade Organization (WTO), has said: “Imports are a good indicator of economic health — they are a sign both of consumer demand and industrial activity. For many American companies, imports provide essential component parts for their goods, often at prices which help them to remain competitive. By supporting companies to grow and export in this way, imports are a critical component of any vibrant economy.”

A study unveiled during Imports Work Week in 2013 found that 16 million U.S. jobs depend on imports. A recent study by HSBC shows that imports save the average U.S. family $13,600 a year.  A 2013 study also found that the U.S. value-added for imported apparel equals about 70 percent.

More information about Imports Work Week can be found at www.importswork.com or through Twitter at @importswork.

The Coordinating Committee for Imports Work Week includes the following:

American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA)

American Association of Exporters and Importers (AAEI)

Coalition for GSP

Consuming Industries Trade Action Coalition (CITAC)

Emergency Committee for American Trade (ECAT)

Fashion Accessories Shippers Association (FASA)

Footwear Distributor and Retailers of America (FDRA)

Gemini Shippers Group

International Wood Products Association (IWPA)

National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones (NAFTZ)

National Fisheries Institute

National Retail Federation (NRF)

Outdoor Industry Association (OIA)

Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA)

Toy Industry Association (TIA)

Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Apparel Coalition

Travel Goods Association (TGA)

U.S. Fashion Industry Association (USFIA)

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

U.S. Council for International Business (USCIB)

Washington Council on International Trade (WCIT)

Gemini Shippers Group Launches New Partnership with Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America (FDRA)

By | Gemini News | No Comments

Gemini Shippers and FDRA have launched a strategic partnership which offers FDRA members the full range of benefits of membership in Gemini Shippers Group.

Footwear importers continue to face significant challenges associated with the movement of cargo from overseas factories to the US market, driven by the underlying poor health of the ocean liner industry, and the evolving trend of industry consolidation and carrier alliance restructuring.  Today, shippers face constant challenges working with their ocean carrier partners to secure the required space and price options to bring their product to market on time and within budget.

To aid FDRA members in this effort, FDRA and Gemini Shippers Group have formed an alliance.  Gemini Shippers Group, one of the largest shippers associations in the United States, offers member companies access to competitive global ocean freight contracts, and long term rates and space allocations by signing global contracts with a wide variety of top tier ocean carriers.

Working with its 200 plus member companies, Gemini Shippers Group helps companies to navigate the complex world of ocean shipping procurement offering members the very competitive stable pricing of a very large BCO with the flexibility of an NVOCC.  Relying on strong carrier relationships and the cumulative volumes of the member companies, Gemini is able to offer highly competitive ocean freight rates on the carrier partner of your choice, without an MQC commitment.  Shippers can mitigate their contracting risk working through Gemini’s year long, staggered expiration, fixed rate contracts and a host of benefits including:

  • No Fee to Join
  • No MQC volume commitment
  • Over 15 carrier partners to choose from
  • Unlike an NVOCC, shipments move on the carriers Bill of Lading for visibility at origin and destination, maintaining complete control and visibility of their carriers and shipments
  • Direct carrier sales representation
  • Representation in China to assist origin offices and forwarders
  • Forwarder and Broker neutral
  • Access to Gemini IT portal with track and trace, rate database and analytics dashboard
  • All Bills of Lading are audited for rate accuracy
  • We advocate on behalf of the member, and consult on all aspects of their logistics needs

Gemini Shippers Group is excited to enter into this strategic partnership with the FDRA and to work with its members on their shipping and transportation needs. To find out more about joining Gemini Shippers Group, FDRA members are asked to contact: Nicole Uchrin, Managing Director, nuchrin@geminishippers.com / 646-741-1962

For more information on Gemini Shippers Group please visit our website   www.geminishippers.com

RILA and TPM Events Shape Issues Affecting the Supply Chain

By | Gemini News, Industry News | No Comments

By Sara Mayes, President / CEO Gemini Shippers Group

Last week shippers and carriers came together at two of the industry’s iconic events to discuss a range of issues impacting the supply chain today.

The 16th annual Transpacific Maritime Conference was held in Long Beach. Over two and a half days, carriers and shippers discussed a range of issues affecting the Transpacific trade, supply and demand and operational issues affecting carriers and shippers alike.  Concurrently, in Dallas, the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA) met for their 2016 Retail Supply Chain Conference.  While each conference had its own distinct focus, a number of common themes which highlighted the risks and opportunities shippers and carriers face, were prevalent in both venues.

Demand and Growth: Expectations for trade growth in 2016 remain muted. A host of noted economists parsed the global economy along various lines, but a key theme emerged that demand in 2016 will remain   modest and in the low single digit range.  For carriers, this lack of demand likely means that the current overcapacity, and downward corollary pressure on rates, will continue. For shippers, the need to maximize sales to an increasingly nimble and fickle shopper continues unabated.

Disruption: A number of panels at TPM continued to voice concern over ongoing disruption in the liner shipping space brought on by a host of changes including; global alliances, carrier M&A, port congestion, labor disruption, chassis provisioning, SOLAS weight rules, and the upcoming opening of the enlarged locks at the Panama Canal.  The takeaway from all stakeholders was that shippers’ supply chains must remain flexible to deal with this ever changing landscape.

Omni-Channel Shoppers:  Both conferences highlighted the changes being felt in the supply chain due to the increase in E-Commerce and the effect that Omni-Channel shopping has on the supply chain.  For retailers, the added complexity of multi-channel inventory management, Buy Online – Pick Up In Store, same day delivery and the on demand economy continues to present challenges for network design and inventory management.

Technology:  Both conferences highlighted the continued need for all parties in the supply chain to adapt new technologies to improve performance.  Numerous speakers noted the transformation of a new digital supply chain network driven by analytics and visualization.  Enabled by big data technologies, interconnected networks can provide supply chain executives with real time descriptive, predictive and prescriptive insight that, once established, allows for real-time visibility, customer segmentation intelligence, and planning.

Human Capital & Technology:  With so many changes occurring in the Supply Chain today, many speakers emphasized the need for supply chain team members to embrace and become knowledgeable with the new technologies of analytics and data science.

In closing the RILA conference, former Commander of the USS Benfold and bestselling author, Mike Abrashoff, noted that a motivated and well  led team was paramount to the supply chain.  He called upon supply chain leaders to constantly lead and motivate their teams and embrace a culture of excellence. Commander Abrashoff closed with the compelling call to all supply chain leaders “If you’re not getting the results you’re looking for, challenge the process.”

As each conference highlighted, today we operate in challenging times, and the successful will embrace change and technology with a motivated team of professionals able to adapt and react quickly to the challenges of a changing industry landscape.

The major take away from both conferences was the acknowledgement that we are operating in challenging times and, in order to be successful, we must embrace the change and technology with a motivated team of professionals in order to adapt and react  quickly to the challenges of a changing industry landscape.

 

Latest Update on SOLAS Chassis Rules

By | Gemini News, Industry News | No Comments

By J. Michael Cavanaugh | Eric Lee | Holland & Knight

International containership carriers will implement recent amendments to the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Convention on July 1, 2016, requiring shippers to provide verified gross mass (VGM) certificates to ocean carriers for all containers.

The VGM document requirement is mandatory, although IMO “Guidelines” on methods for implementation are not mandatory.

Key stakeholders are continuing to engage the U.S. Coast Guard in an effort to clarify its position on the U.S. application and enforcement of the SOLAS VGM requirement.

Some confusion and uncertainty has arisen in the international ocean shipping and logistics industry following several public statements and FAQs released by the U.S. Coast Guard in the past few days regarding the impending implementation of the IMO’s SOLAS Convention container weight regulation. Under SOLAS Chapter VI, Regulation 2, effective July 1, 2016, IMO flag-state containership operators and the marine terminals at which their vessels load must receive a shipper-signed weight certificate stating the “verified gross mass” (VGM) for each container before loading to the vessel. Major carrier and shipper stakeholders have interpreted the Coast Guard’s remarks as questioning whether the requirement is mandatory, whether it applies to shippers or will be enforced at U.S. ports, and what the Coast Guard will do to implement the rule. Industry stakeholders are continuing to engage the Coast Guard in an effort to clarify the Coast Guard’s position regarding application and enforcement of Regulation 2, e.g., the World Shipping Council’s March 3, 2016, letter to Admiral Paul F. Zukunft, Commandant of the Coast Guard.

What’s Certain

A review of SOLAS Chapter VI, Regulation 2, the recent Coast Guard statements and Coast Guard FAQs, as well as interpretations of the Regulation 2 amendments by ocean carriers and authorities worldwide, makes it clear that: 1) the SOLAS verified gross mass certificate (VGM) is mandatory for IMO flag-state vessels operating in international trade; 2) the VGM requirement will be implemented by July 1 for such vessels loading at U.S. ports; and 3) IMO “Guidelines” for implementation are not mandatory, so carriers and shippers have some flexibility to work out acceptable procedures. Although the Coast Guard now questions whether the SOLAS regulation applies to shippers or terminals in the United States, and sees little or no enforcement role for itself in the process, there is no dispute that it applies to the IMO flag-state vessels engaged in international trade, and thus the vessel operators may, and presumably all will, implement the shipper-signed weight document requirement as of July 1 at U.S. ports.

Regulation 2 Mandatory Requirements

Regulation 2, which is mandatory for IMO flag-state vessels (the U.S., most major shipping nations and international registries, e.g., Panama, Liberia, Marshall Islands, Bahamas), requires that shippers must verify by a reliable method the weight of each container tendered, that shippers must timely provide to the vessel’s master and the terminal a “shipping document” signed by the shipper’s representative verifying such weight, and that no container may be loaded to an IMO flag-state vessel for international carriage unless the shipper has provided the vessel operator and terminal with such document. Fully parsed out, the three short paragraphs of Regulation 2 covering this topic require the following:

  1. The shipper must verify the gross mass of each container
  2. The container gross mass must be stated in a “shipping document”
  3. The document must be signed by the shipper’s representative
  4. Weight cannot be estimated, and must be obtained by using one of two “Methods”:
  • Method 1 – weigh the loaded container using equipment that is calibrated and certified per local requirements at point of weighing
  • Method 2 – weigh goods and packing/dunnage using a certified method approved by competent authority at weighing location, and add to tare weight of container (printed on the container’s door)
  1. The document must be provided to the master and terminal prior to loading

If all the above are not done, then the carrier shall refuse loading. Note that Regulation 2 does not state the time by which the document must be provided. That may be established by the terminal or the carrier.

IMO Guidelines

Possibly leading to some of the current confusion is uncertainty regarding the IMO’s “Guidelines Regarding the Verified Gross Mass of a Container Carrying Cargo” issued June 9, 2014. The Guidelines are not mandatory, but they provide a more detailed discussion and definitions, and are “intended to establish a common approach for the implementation and enforcement of the SOLAS requirements regarding the verification of the gross mass of packed containers.”

Flexibility Allowed

Taken as a whole, Regulation 2, the IMO Guidelines and the Coast Guard’s statements and FAQs indicate that international shippers must provide signed VGM documents meeting the minimum procedural and content requirements of the regulation, and that vessels engaged in international trade will not load containers for which no such signed document has been provided prior to loading. Beyond this, however, the exact manner and arrangements by which carriers, shippers and regulators will implement and enforce Regulation 2 is flexible. Parties can cooperate to use any methods or procedures, as long as they satisfy all of the clear requirements of the regulation.

Additionally, note that Regulation 2, paragraph 6 states that “if the shipping document, with regard to a packed container, does not provide the verified gross mass and the master or his representative and the terminal representative have not obtained the verified gross mass of the packed container, it shall not be loaded on the ship.” If a container scheduled for loading has no document, paragraph 13 of the Guidelines suggests that the carrier or terminal themselves, or a subcontractor, could weigh it using Method 1 (weighing the loaded box) and proceed to load. In such a case, the carrier or terminal likely would impose a charge, which could be billed to the shipper if the parties had an arrangement in place, or the carrier or terminal might have the ability to charge the cargo based on a tariff, a bill of lading or other applicable terms.

Furthermore, paragraph 5.1.2.1 of the IMO Guidelines states that sealed packages arriving for shipment that have accurate weights marked on them do not need to be reweighed. Thus, a carrier receiving LCL items could rely on the package weight and use Method 2 to determine VGM prior to loading.

In addition, some ports, such as Charleston, have announced they will have weighing equipment available.

Coast Guard Position

In more recent statements, the Coast Guard questions whether Regulation 2 applies to shippers or terminals in the U.S. However, on its face, Regulation 2, which the Coast Guard confirms is mandatory, expressly states that shippers must determine container weight by Method 1 or 2, and must provide the weight document to the vessel master and terminal before loading. The World Shipping Council, which represents containership operators and participated along with the Coast Guard in the IMO process leading to adoption of the recent amendments, has sent a strong letter to the Coast Guard demanding further clarification of the agency’s interpretation.

For now, the Coast Guard’s position appears to mean the agency itself will not act to enforce the SOLAS regulations, and will not impose fines or take other regulatory action as to missing or inaccurate shipper weight certificates. However, this controversy may not have any material effect on shippers’ weight certificate obligations at U.S. terminals. The vessel operators – which the Coast Guard agrees are subject to the mandatory SOLAS regulations – are on track to implement the requirement on July 1, with or without Coast Guard compliance activity.

If you would like to begin receiving this or any other Holland & Knight publication directly, please subscribe now.

 

Gemini Shippers Group Attends SOLAS Weight Guidelines Session

By | Gemini News, Industry News | No Comments

yyyyy ssssssyyyyy

February 18th Washington DC

Ken O’Brien, Chief Operating Officer of Gemini Shippers Group, attended a listening session hosted by the Federal Maritime Commission.  It was held to discuss amendments to SOLAS Regulation VI-2 regarding cargo information and the verified gross mass of containers.

These regulations, which go into effect on July 1, 2016, require that shippers, regardless of who packed the container, verify and provide the container’s gross verified weight to the ocean carrier and terminal representative prior to it being loaded onto a ship.

Rear Admiral Paul F. Thomas, Assistant Commandant for Prevention Policy with the U.S. Coast Guard,  joined industry stakeholders to hear concerns and answer questions on the new rule and how it would be enforced in the United States.

The Admiral provided guidance on the enforcement powers of the U.S Coast Guard on this regulation and advised those in attendance that “Delayed implementation is not an option”.

Shippers and Carriers were advised to proceed quickly with preparation for the July 1 implementation.  One point of clarification gained at the meeting was further insight on how shippers could go about ascertaining the certified mass of the container.

As noted in many industry journals, shippers have two acceptable methods to measure the container weight.  Method one is to weigh the container once goods are loaded into the container at a truck scale prior to in-gate at the origin terminal.  The second method is to weigh the cargo that is going into the container, and then add the weight to the empty container Tare Weight.  Admiral Thomas assured shippers that the use of the Tare Weight stenciled on the container was acceptable and, under existing IMO guidelines, could be used under method two and that weighing of the empty container was not required.

While each shipper will have to determine the best and most cost effective method to use, our research indicates that method two can likely result in less disruption and cost in the supply chain, provided shippers can determine the exact weights of cargo being loaded at their origin factories.

Admiral Thomas also told shippers that the enforcement by US Coast Guard and maritime authorities in other countries will be on carriers and ports, and not on individual shippers.  Carriers and the ship’s “flag-state” are required to abide by the IMO rules and, given this mandate, the ability to delay these rules by any one country or flag is nonexistent. The admiral noted that his agency will not be holding shippers directly accountable, noting that only carriers and vessels are party to the SOLAS amendment, not shippers.  Thomas noted “There is no authority under SOLAS that requires shippers to do anything.” Carrier and terminals will however hold shippers accountable and not accept cargo without the compliant weight verification in place prior to loading.

With this in mind, we encourage Gemini members to work with their origin factories and vendors and consolidators to determine which method is best determining the gross container mass.

Geminin Shippers Group will continue to work with our carrier partners to determine their plans to capture and transmit weight information to terminal operators. We also emphasized to our carrier partners the need for detailed information on the timing of data transmission cutoffs.

Follow up questions on the listening session and container weight rules can be directed to Ken O’Brien at kobrien@geminishippers.com.

Align your freight portfolio to meet your business requirements

By | Gemini News, Industry News | No Comments

By Sara Mayes, President and CEO, Gemini Shippers Group

As the head of a shippers’ association, I often get questions from supply chain leaders on how they should allocate their freight for the upcoming 2016 contracting season.  Like years past, shippers face a multitude of questions to consider when determining carrier allocations.

Carriers and Alliances:  How do I allocate cargo among the various carriers and alliances products?

Routing Options: How should we allocate between the US East and West Coast?  For cargo destined to the US East Coast, should we focus on strings that move via the Panama Canal or the Suez Canal?  Which ports should we use as gateway ports for inland intermodal cargo?  Should we book our shipment for door delivery or arrange last mile logistics ourselves?  Which underlying class I railroad is optimal for our inland cargo?  What do I do about Chassis?

Rate Structure:  Should we lock in long term rates or focus on short term spot pricing?

Service Requirements:  How important is transit time?  How important is customer service and documentation? What other value added services do I require?

Carriers vs. NVOCC or Shippers Association:  Should we procure direct contracts with Ocean carriers, or route freight via a freight intermediary, or a shippers’ association?

Price: What is a fair and reasonable price for the service levels I require?

In a normal year, supply chain managers face an enormous task of analyzing the almost endless permutations of origins – destinations – carriers – alliances – gateways – railroads – drayage companies and price options available to them.

This year shippers have a more sizable challenge driven by the high level of uncertainty facing ocean shipping.

Product uncertainty:  Pending M&A activity and the opening of the enlarged Panama Canal will most likely lead to significant product changes for many carriers and vessel alliances in 2016.

Price Uncertainty:  Significant overcapacity, and tepid global demand have introduced an extreme amount of rate volatility into the market in 2015.  Low ocean freight rates buoyed by recent low bunker prices have driven rates to recent historical lows, putting carriers’ ability to remain profitable at risk.

With all of these factors in play, my answer to shippers on how to allocate their cargo is simple: allocate cargo like you should allocate your investment portfolio – carefully, thoughtfully, diversified, and aligned with your tolerance for risk.

Here at Gemini Shippers, we help to educate our member companies on the changing permutations of choice and help them to align their carrier selections to create a value proposition that corresponds to service level and price goals required to successfully manage their supply chain.   With our diverse carrier options and no required commitment from members, we offer tremendous flexibility.

Understanding the freight ecosystem and your company’s business requirements before you allocate cargo in 2016 is key to a successful contracting program.

To find out how Gemini can make a difference for your company, visit us at www.geminishippers.com or call us at 212-947-3424.

 

NY- NJ Port Terminals hit by ILA Walkout

By | Gemini News, Industry News | No Comments

Container terminals at the Port of New York and New Jersey were idled Friday morning when International Longshoremen’s Association workers walked off the job. The walkout began about 10am, and reportedly affected all port terminals. Trucking company dispatchers advised drivers to avoid joining queues outside terminal gates. There was no official confirmation of the cause of the walkout. However, multiple sources said it was due to ILA unhappiness with hiring rules of the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, which oversees port hiring. The ILA walkout came as New York-New Jersey terminals were struggling to catch up after a four-day weekend shutdown from Winter Storm Jonas, and a three- day holiday the previous weekend for the Martin Luther King Day observance.